Compliance
Agents that perform the function of a compliance operator, tested continuously against a published framework.
-
Control testing
Evaluates controls continuously against the framework.
-
Third-party risk
Assesses vendors on entry and holds them under review.
Continuous control testing
Controls are tested on a cadence the framework sets, not the one an annual audit allows. An agent evaluates the control, gathers what proves it, and records the reasoning behind the verdict.
Because the standard is published, the output is checkable by someone who did not produce it. That is what makes the discipline suitable for autonomous operation.
Evidence and third-party risk
Evidence is collected as it is generated rather than reconstructed before an audit window. Vendor and third-party review runs on the same footing: assessed on entry, then held under review for as long as the relationship lasts.
Engagement
- Continuous control testing
- Evidence collection
- Vendor review
- Security Continuous offensive security and defensive operations run by autonomous agents: vulnerability research, exploit development, adversary emulation and detection engineering.
- AI agent security AI red teaming and agentic AI security review: prompt injection, tool and permission abuse, MCP poisoning, RAG exfiltration and model supply chain risk — tested continuously, before production.
- Revenue operations Agents performing clinical coding, denial appeals and prior authorisation, at a volume and consistency staffing cannot reach.
- Bid and proposal Agents performing requirement extraction, compliance matrices and response drafting for government and enterprise tenders.
Bring a market. We run the discipline.
For operators and organisations deploying agents at scale. Not a hire. Not an enquiry.
partner@boutrig.com